Aromaz Radiant Energy Joint Research Group

[Aromaz]

[Inquorate]

Evidence tesla made free energy device

New Energy Generator That "Would Not Consume Fuel" - Tesla's Letter to Robert U. Johnson

[Aromaz]

Photon

The following is not my personal writing but a series of clips from various items I have. Forgive me for not stating the original authors, they are 'lost' in my studies.
The photon was originally called a light quantum by Albert Einstein. The modern name photon derives from the Greek word for light and was given in 1926 by Gilbert Lewis. The photon is massless, has no electric charge, and does not decay spontaneously in empty space. A photon has two possible polarization states and is described by exactly three continuous parameters: the components of its wave vector, which determine its wavelength λ and its direction of propagation. The photon is the gauge boson for electromagnetism and therefore all other quantum numbers are zero.

In physics, the photon is an elementary particle, the quantum of the electromagnetic field and the basic unit of light and all other forms of electromagnetic radiation. It is also the force carrier for the electromagnetic force. This force is easily visible human-scale effects and applications, from sunlight to radiotelephones, are due to the fact that the photon has no mass and thus can produce interactions at long distances. Like all elementary particles, the photon is governed by quantum mechanics and so exhibits wave-particle duality: that is, it exhibits both wave and particle properties. For example, a single photon may undergo refraction by a lens or exhibit wave interference, but also act as a particle giving a definite result when its location is measured.

Photons are emitted in many natural processes. For example, when a charge is accelerated it emits synchrotron radiation. During a molecular, atomic or nuclear transition to a lower energy level, photons of various energies will be emitted, from infrared light to gamma rays. A photon can also be emitted when a particle and its corresponding anti-particle are annihilated.

In empty space, the photon could move as fast (even suspected to be faster) than the speed of light.

(From: Fermi Telescope Makes First Big Discovery: Gamma Ray Pulsar | Universe Today )



HOW DOES PHOTON AND ELECTRONS COME TOGETHER?
An exciton is a bound state of an electron and an imaginary particle called an electron hole in an insulator or semiconductor, and such is a Coulomb-correlated electron-hole pair. It is an elementary excitation, or a quasiparticle of a solid. In current research, the bound electron and hole pairs (excitons) provide a means to transport energy without transporting net charge.[1]

A vivid picture of exciton formation is as follows: A photon enters a semiconductor, exciting an electron from the valence band into the conduction band. The missing electron in the valence band leaves a hole (of opposite electric charge) behind, to which the electron is attracted by the Coulomb force. The exciton results from the binding of the electron with its hole. As a result, the exciton has slightly less energy than the unbound electron and hole. The wave function of the bound state is hydrogenic (an "exotic atom" state akin to that of a hydrogen atom). However, the binding energy is much smaller and the size much bigger than a hydrogen atom because of the effects of screening and the effective mass of the constituents in the material.

The probability of the hole disappearing (the electron occupying the hole) is limited by the difficulty of losing the excess energy, and as a result excitons can have a relatively long lifetime. (Lifetimes up to several milliseconds have been observed in copper (I) oxide) Another limiting factor in the recombination probability is the spatial overlap of the electron and hole wavefunctions (roughly the probability for the electron to run into the hole). This overlap is smaller for lighter electrons and holes and for highly excited hydrogenic states.

The whole exciton can move through the solid. With this additional kinetic energy the exciton may lie above the band-gap.

The exciton propagating through molecular crystal is one that is of greatest concern. Several mechanisms have been proposed in the literature. Two are important. The first one is exciton energy dissipated due to interaction with phonon bath. The other one is energy carried away by radiation. Combination of the two has also been studied.

Much like molecular systems that have well defined resonances, excitons can undergo internal conversions from energetically higher lying states to lower lying states by coupling to vibrational or electronic degrees of freedom. Internal conversions usually take place of a time scale of a few to tens of femto seconds. Also, intersystem crossings are possible when adequate spin orbit interactions are present in the material, and usually take place on a time scale of a few to hundreds of picoseconds.

Imagine a certain piece of metal that, when you put ultraviolet light on it, you can measure the energy of some electrons 'escaping' from the metal. From the very basic wave mechanics, one would expect that if you increased the 'intensity' of the light you would see more energetic electrons pulling off from it (picture a little paper boat in a lake where you make some waves - the more 'intense' you make them, the more the boat will jump up with greater velocities).

Well, actually experimental results tell you that this does NOT happens. When you increase the intensity of the wave, only the NUMBER of electrons emitted from the metal will increase - not its ENERGY. The observed result is that only when you increase the FREQUENCY of the light you are applying, then the energy of the electrons will be greater. That sounds really strange for the wave nature of light.


WHAT WE SHOULD KNOW:
A: Photons are weight-less, has no electrical charge, magnetic force.
B: Moves at the speed of light - or faster
C: Result of natuaral process i.e. nuclear reaction, annihilation
D: Photons is radiation with energy billions times that of visible light
E: Known effects of photons are typical electrical and light

[Aromaz]

Realization

This is the truth of the matter you were waiting for, this is the absolute real description of what many people call Radiant energy, Zero Point energy, Energy from the vacuum, Free energy......and by so many other names.

PHOTONS are THE UNIVERAL ENERGY

PHOTONS are RADIANT ENERGY

In other words, what we are trying to capture and convert is PHOTONS
- or rather the effects of them.

[Aromaz]

[Inquorate]

@ all

Please read this summary of william lynne's dissertation on tesla's dynamic theory of gravity. Then buy, beg, steal, borrow his books,

I've read them. And that's how I know so much about the aether. ALL particles, all energy, and all forces are the result of forms ie vortices and stresses / polarization / movement of aether.

It's simple and profound.

Summation of Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity

I feel like chucking a tantrum because I can tell no-one has read it despite my many promptings.

I've shared some thoughts with Aromaz re what is happening with 'current' based on the model of aether outlined ibm the above link.

[Inquorate]

Here's one of his 3 books

Pentagon Ufo's by William Lyne | Scribd

[sucahyo]

Great idea for posting in section. It would make it easier to read . Although I am of those who use electricity without knowing what it is, I agree that knowing what electricity is can help us progress faster. So many what we don't know, what it is, what cause it, what it's effect is, what is it's behavior, how to make it behave like we want to, what item can be used, etc.

Just wondering, do atom really is the way current science know about?

About magnet, the middle part, between the opposing pole do not attract metal. Do this happen in electricity too? There are electricity that polarity can only be felt only at the pole?

Konstantin Meyl wrote that Tesla bifilar coil, flat spiral coil one, is a way to capture the photon (or neutrino as Meyl call it). It can be used to convert electron to neutrino or the opposite.

[Aromaz]

@sucahyo;About magnet, the middle part, between the opposing pole do not attract metal. Do this happen in electricity too? There are electricity that polarity can only be felt only at the pole?

In fact there are more than the two poles N and S in a magnet. For instance there is another 'smaller' magnet located at the tip of the N-pole and another at the tip of the S-pole = both of which is the reverse of the full magnet.

Then there is another complete magnetic flux around the center of the magnet. Thus the complete magnet does attract magnetic material, but in the center there is a point of balance where attraction and repulsion becomes equal - thus appearing to be not attracting.

Electromagnetism is in many ways similar, like a coil but in a long conductor it is different where the polarity is 'around' the wire. I have not seen nor read about the same effects as magnet with poles - yet' but that study is for expansion on a later stage.

Konstantin Meyl wrote that Tesla bifilar coil, flat spiral coil one, is a way to capture the photon (or neutrino as Meyl call it). It can be used to convert electron to neutrino or the opposite.

Photon is different from Neutrino in such that a pair of neutrino's forms when photon decays (breaks down) in a strong magnetic field. Though this is still pure 'theory'. Others again say that photons are the products of annihilation of neutrinos which is the primary source of ultra high cosmic rays - and a cascade of photons. Very confusing except that they concur - Photons and Neutrino are different particles.

Electron to Neutrino or visa versa does not stick - yet. The possibility that Tesla's bifilar coil acts as magnet or converter of either electron or neutrino are somewhat difficult - Because both neutrino and photon are said to be mass-less; no weight - thus no attract or repulsion.

BUT all this said, I am still investigating and will not say above is correct. There are just too many things that does not add up - yet, that is why I did not expand on it previously.

Sometimes I wish there was a feature to add graphics here. Probably will make a video later on with graphics to explain it easy and simple. Surprising how complex things can appear until you scratch their surface and see how simple they are.

[Bodkins]

Please read this summary of william lynne's dissertation on tesla's dynamic theory of gravity. Then buy, beg, steal, borrow his books,

I've read them. And that's how I know so much about the aether. ALL particles, all energy, and all forces are the result of forms ie vortices and stresses / polarization / movement of aether.

It's simple and profound.

Summation of Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity

I feel like chucking a tantrum because I can tell no-one has read it despite my many promptings.

I've shared some thoughts with Aromaz re what is happening with 'current' based on the model of aether outlined ibm the above link.

what did you say, people take there own path!!!!
you now no how i feel.

[Inquorate]

@ bodkins

Consider me suitably chastised

[Aromaz]

Game of words, Puzzle of facts

Please read this summary of william lynne's dissertation on tesla's dynamic theory of gravity. Then buy, beg, steal, borrow his books ..........

[Aromaz]

UFO Facts

Oh just to clear something that could be misundersood:

I believe the USA does in fact have Electric Flying machines which could be seen as UFO's; but that is from other more reliable people than Lyne.

Though sometimes there is a very small amount of doubt, I can really state that the works of Stan Deyo is far more creditable, scientific and reality than any other I found anywhere in public domain.

The doubt? Because Stan was an intelligence operator so he know how to use facts and present them as lies - and how to use lies to present them as facts. In general, I do not have any reason or proof to discredit anything I have seen of Stan and Holy Deyo - yet.

You can start of with Google "Stan Deyo" and from their website:

Welcome to The Millennium Ark

[sucahyo]

http://jnaudin.free.fr/seike/gseav3.htm

Edit:
I try two kind of Moebius coil, both failed lighting up LED. I will stick with Tesla bifilar coil for now.

[Inquorate]

Lynne

I agree that the guy is far off on his conspiracy theory claims, etc...... It's the model of the aether I find interesting :-)