Aromaz Radiant Energy Joint Research Group

[sucahyo]

@Aromaz, what material relevant? would magnet and elctromagnet need to be re learned too?


About spark gap, what kind of spark gap everyone use?

Anyone ever make a unidirectional spark gap? maybe a needle opposing a steel ball?

[Inquorate]

Spark gap

I have a soldering tip as one electrode, a ball bearing superglued to a bolt as the other. Hot glued two plastic washers on the ends of a small length of clear plastic tubing. The nut for the bolt is glued to one washer. Because it is (mostly) sealed, the air inside will ionize so less deterioration of spark electrode surfaces. I'm quenching it with neomagnets, but electromagnet will do as well.

Still waiting on delivery of hv (20kv) diodes so it will make hv dc pulsed square waves...

Will post pics and video soon, at 'work' all afternoon, chaperoning a guy with disability to local speedway sprint racing... Not a bad job if you can get it. I keep thinking how archaic the technology of cars is.

Sigh

[Aromaz]

New Video uploaded

@Inquorate: thank you for your effort and contribution. I am surely looking forward to hear about your findings.

@sucahyo: Regarding magnetic force; in fact we (as in all humans) do know very little about it. For the present we can just accept that what is generally understood. Electromagnetic is OK - if you accept magnetic knowledge. As far as the propagation of magnetic force by current through conductor - at low frequency - sounds reasonably solid.

@All: I have uploaded video #030 which has been pending all this last few days with visitors. It is actually three clips -

#1 about changes in lab where I am doing away witht he building ground; with no effect change at all.
#2 results I had with small zenner, 4007 and larger 1,000V 1A diodes and energy going unrestricted both ways.
#3 Small part about HV environment.

I hope to be back in the lab full time by Tuesday morning.

[Vortex]

Source link
"certain experiments performed by Tesla involving the movement of energy with no accompanying magnetic field.

Looks like this is a known about, no magnetic field, unknown.
Lots of good info on the source link, but I thought this one would
"ring your bell" or compass as it were.

Randy

[sucahyo]

There is also a good quote:

To create radiant electricity, you will have to modify your pulse motor just a bit. Think of gas running through your wires instead of electron flow while doing this. Tesla always referred to radiant electricity as a fluid nature. What you want is to pulse your coils very hard and fast. Double your supply voltage to your coils at least. You want to push them to their limit with voltage and amps without destroying the coils. I start with normal voltage to get the motor going, then switch to a higher voltage to prevent coil and switch burn out. Don't worry..your EMF collection wiring will still collect and run the BEMF back to your batteries. (You may have to go to larger diodes) This will drive your motor to a very high rpm, which is what you want. Make sure your pulse switches can handle the extra speed and amps. They will float if you don't. The higher the speed, the lower the amps draw.

But something new will begin to happen. You will start to feel a stinging on your hands and face. Wear your safety glasses. Nothing can shield this effect. It goes through anything. It won’t hurt you but it is irritating. You are getting close. Get your speed up more until this quits happening. Stop the motor and build a bifilar coil wired (coreless) in series.( I can send you a diagram if you wish) Or several of them. Place these coils around the motor. Not around the pulse coils!!! Just start out putting them a foot or so around the motor and measure voltage. (Set your meter on AC) Bifilar coils don't want or like magnetic flux, they are a receiver coil of the radiant electricity.

@Aromaz, is it possible for us to split the common ground of the coil? so the high voltage part do not share the same negative as the low voltage part?

Maybe the transistor would last longer if we can.

[broli]

Here is my humble feedback. Aromaz et al., if you want to understand these effects better I think we need to start where tesla started and then trace his steps to energy from the universe from there. We first need to know what we're looking for by artificially exciting the aether and sending it over to a receiver. Meaning wireless transmission of power without any losses.

Now this requires a few things to be done. First of all DITCH the ignition coils. They are completely worthless. We need to make very custom coils that have certain fixed parameters to each other. There will only be one resonance frequency (as far as I know). There also has to be a relation between the length of the conductor, the resonant frequency and the wave length in speed of light in the wire (I'm still not very sure about this). This is why Tesla said it would be wise to start with long cables, and then cut them shorter untill you are in the sweet spot. With an ignition coil it's pure guess work and poking in the dark.

Second of all. NO CURRENT like we all know. We need rapid changing electrical fields not currents. This is why Tesla stepped up his final discharge to have an insanely rapid shifts of very high tensions more precisely electrical fields.

Now fast changing electrical fields are nothing new. We know and have been taught A degenerate version of them namely that they create EM waves like radio and what not. But I believe that the aetheric exciting is a much purer version. So in the experiments don't be fooled by lit bulbs as you might be still in the EM realm where power diminishes as 1/distance^2.

Please let me know your view.

Peace out.

[Aromaz]

The bottom line of what I am trying to say is: Tesla is a waypoint on this road, nether he nor his known/proven achievements are the destination; else we would not be playing around today.

[sucahyo]

For me, I just want to know how to make the device that can tap this radiant energy. So if it's possible I would skip learning what it is and how it happen. Unfortunately, currently we have to learn at least on how it works. Another unfortunate thing is how radiant energy work do not fully understood yet. This force us to learn and experiment.

There is no reason to ditch the car coil if we already have that. From what I read the resonance frequency must be tuned to the load. Meaning we have to build different coil for different load. There is no such thing as general coil for every load. This make it hard for people with limited budget that want to experiment. But I guess roto verter / transverter / tesla coil experimenter already learn a lot about this. Even if it's limited, we can still use car coil or anything available for learning something we don't know yet. There are things that don't depend on spesific coil.

I think there is more need for improved electrical efficiency than wireless. Improved efficiency would allow reduced electricall bill, long distance electrical vehicle, indirect method for more fuel engine mileage, etc. And if it's possible this device should use low cost material. Maybe the closest thing for this today is Mr Robert Adams motor.

[Aromaz]

Photons

@broli; PLEASE do not consider the above from me as an attack;
I only want to stretch the point that we have to walk a new road that does lead somewhere, not just keep on duplicating.

@sucahyo; You are right on head with "Low cost energy" and yes, we have to go digging.

A preview of either document or few part video:
I am still gathering it all together and will be working on this a few more days; in between experiments.

#1: The energy we are looking for and hoping to tap into is not just another form or electricity.
It is THE energy; it originates from the first original second of our Universe; be it Big Bang or White hole.

#2: To be more general; it also consists of the emissions from stars, quasars, pulsars and other matter.

#3: The form of energy we are talking about is ElectromagneticPhotonsPhotons and Excitons To use PHOTONS to excite ELECTRONS thus creating our electricity.

[Rectified]

[broli]

@broli; PLEASE do not consider the above from me as an attack;
I only want to stretch the point that we have to walk a new road that does lead somewhere, not just keep on duplicating.

Thanks for your view .

Well maybe our opinions differ here. Because I believe the past 100 years science has made a very big mistake adapting and worshiping maxwell's equations. While Tesla even convinced Hertz that his discovery of EM waves wasn't the whole picture.

So I don't see what's wrong by back stepping and starting where Tesla left off. His lectures and patents have a tremendous amount of information that can help out a lot. I completely agree on the fact that it's best to actually have some sort of understanding of what you're doing and WHY instead going aping what Tesla did and quitting because you didn't get the desired results. But that's the cool part, the more you experiment and the more experience you build up even if you're a farmer with no scientifically background you're bound to reach the same results.

Obviously we live in more modern times. A lot of components can be replaced by semiconductors. Even the spark gap can be replaced by a transistor hooked to a signal generator and so on. Tesla needed to invent most of his components for his setups while we can buy them readily for very little money and a fraction of the size that Tesla worked with.

[Aromaz]

FORCE 1:RESULT 1: Our Universal energy is a remnant from the Origin of the Universe. We humans perceive this force of the universe as Electromagnetic though I personally will dare say it is much more and probably something we do not really know yet.

FORCE 2:RESULT 2:CONCLUSION:

[Aromaz]

Let us see what Wikipedia and most people say:
Gravity is a natural phenomenon by which objects with mass attract one another.
Anti-gravityGravity is the force that attracts. It can only exist with objects of MASS. No mass, no attraction.

Anti-gravity is the force that repels. It can also only exist with objects of mass. No mass, no repulsion.

Thus, IF we have a matter that does not have mass,
that matter will neither have gravity nor anti-gravity.

We will come back to this critical statement soon.

[Aromaz]

Two-Dimensional are people who are purely theorizers and mostly they are also excellent in mathematics. The best known example is that I know of is Albert Einstein. Another we all know is Tom Bearden. This people can work something out in their minds and on paper, they can work for many hours around a subject and cut it down to the smallest possible particle. Mostly these people are none less than absolutely brilliant.

The third which will then have to be called Three-Dimensional are people who can think and work something out in real life pictures. They are not able to do mathematical calculations on such subject.
I will place myself in this category. We can think of something in real world manner, but we can not calculate its quantum world. For us to describe the picture is very easy, but to proof the mathematics is near impossible.

The forth kind are the least number of people, they are the ones that can do both the mathematics and the picture. Our best known example is Nikola Tesla (Happy Broli?)

[Inquorate]

Question even the concept of the atom

Tesla's Last Known Living Assistant's Recorded Statement

http://www.nuenergy.org/alt/mathews.htm

Nicolai Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity | Love for Life

Nicolai Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity | Love for Life

Summation of Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity

Summation of Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity