I have disproven Time Dilation and Theory of Relativity

[ldrancer]

a clock has to run analog. and it doesnt. it doesnt run as a machine or in an order. the only thing that clocks, ever measure. yo8u think of it. what? when you? have? to get up? when you ? have? to go to work? what do yo8u really use, a clock for.

[johnnyfalcon]

a clock has to run analog. and it doesnt. it doesnt run as a machine or in an order. the only thing that clocks, ever measure. yo8u think of it. what? when you? have? to get up? when you ? have? to go to work? what do yo8u really use, a clock for.

you are trolling your post is nonsensicle

[johnnyfalcon]

if two people are watching the same movie/broadcast and one is in a rocket they still watch at the same rate


SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME HOW I AM WRONG

relativity says this is wrong what a load of @*@*@

if i am wrong tell me how, why i am wrong

DO NOT TRY TO DERAIL THIS QUESTION THIS QUESTION IS STRAIGHTFOWARD

the only way we can get the truth is to stay focused on what im talking about

[ldrancer]

the day doesnt matter. the calendar in time does. the calendars messed up.
the clock doesnt match the heavens and is a piece of crap.
ok ok okkk

[johnnyfalcon]

the day doesnt matter. the calendar in time does. the calendars messed up.
the clock doesnt match the heavens and is a piece of crap.
ok ok okkk

Explain why

Do you realize you sound like a retard if you dont explain why

[johnnyfalcon]

if two people are watching the same movie/broadcast and one is in a rocket they still watch at the same rate


SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME HOW I AM WRONG
relativity says this is wrong what a load of @*@*@

if i am wrong tell me how, why i am wrong

DO NOT TRY TO DERAIL THIS QUESTION THIS QUESTION IS STRAIGHTFOWARD

the only way we can get the truth is to stay focused on what im talking about

Im waiting on a counter argument

If youre a reletivist and dodge the question you lose the argument

[ldrancer]

theres too many things to go over..
1 there is the leap day.

so a clock calendar is wrong. a day doesnt really matter and thats whats it. a calendar is what matters. and theres too much to explain there, but a day doesnt matter. someone who, doesnt work for a day the world doesnt end. if you didnt do one thing for a day, the world wouldnt end. so. theres proof a day, isnt. the most important thing about dates. and a clock is supposed to measure dates. which it cant. and an actual 24 hour clock, doesnt matter.

[johnnyfalcon]

theres too many things to go over..
1 there is the leap day.

so a clock calendar is wrong. a day doesnt really matter and thats whats it. a calendar is what matters. and theres too much to explain there, but a day doesnt matter. someone who, doesnt work for a day the world doesnt end. if you didnt do one thing for a day, the world wouldnt end. so. theres proof a day, isnt. the most important thing about dates. and a clock is supposed to measure dates. which it cant. and an actual 24 hour clock, doesnt matter.

Leap day\year is because we have 365.25 days per year

The astronomical chart would be off if we didnt add leap day

Keep preaching we cant measure dates if it helps you

[johnnyfalcon]

We accuratley measure asstronomical events, days, ,months and years with clocks


Again thanks for your stupidity another paid poster derailing the thread

[Turion]

Johnny,

The theory of relativity states that as you move faster and begin to approach the speed of light that time (for YOU) between ticks of a clock sloooooooows down or stretches out.

According to the theory, if a person on earth was watching a two hour movie and the person in a space ship moving near the speed of light were watching the same movie it would take each individual two hours of THEIR TIME to watch the movie, but there would be a time difference when the time of one is compared, (related) to the time of the other.

In other words, four hours might have gone by for the person on earth while only two hours went by for the person on the ship because there was twice as much time between the ticks of their clock. You can't prove or disprove this with your movie analogy. It doesn't work that way. The only way to prove it is to take two atomic clocks. Put one in a spaceship traveling as fast as it can go for a period of time and then compare the two and see if they still show the same time. They have actually DONE this with atomic clocks sent up in NASA ships to orbit the Earth at several hundred miles per hour (google it) and they show a difference. Not a tremendous difference, I'll grant you, but then they were only going 600 miles per hour not 670,616,629 miles per hour, which is the speed of light. So if you multiply that slight difference time 100,000 it could be significant.

I'm afraid your movie theory does not even address the theory of relativity because whether the theory of relativity is correct or incorrect, in EITHER CASE each individual would watch a two hour movie in two hours of THEIR OWN TIME. The real question is, "Is there more time between the ticks of the clock as you approach the speed of light or not." I don't have that answer. And nothing YOU or I can do will prove it one way or another. I wish we could.
I hope this makes sense. Not trying to be an ass.

Dave

[ldrancer]

i dont care what none of you *******s say. your stupid not me. so there. i dont give a crap. ill agree withanything that goes against yo8u. and screw this disinfo agent turion. in teh topic too. Your stupid.

[ldrancer]

Johnny,

The theory of relativity states that as you move faster and begin to approach the speed of light that time (for YOU) between ticks of a clock sloooooooows down or stretches out.

According to the theory, if a person on earth was watching a two hour movie and the person in a space ship moving near the speed of light were watching the same movie it would take each individual two hours of THEIR TIME to watch the movie, but there would be a time difference when the time of one is compared, (related) to the time of the other.

In other words, four hours might have gone by for the person on earth while only two hours went by for the person on the ship because there was twice as much time between the ticks of their clock. You can't prove or disprove this with your movie analogy. It doesn't work that way. The only way to prove it is to take two atomic clocks. Put one in a spaceship traveling as fast as it can go for a period of time and then compare the two and see if they still show the same time. They have actually DONE this with atomic clocks sent up in NASA ships to orbit the Earth at several hundred miles per hour (google it) and they show a difference. Not a tremendous difference, I'll grant you, but then they were only going 600 miles per hour not 670,616,629 miles per hour, which is the speed of light. So if you multiply that slight difference time 100,000 it could be significant.

I'm afraid your movie theory does not even address the theory of relativity because whether the theory of relativity is correct or incorrect, in EITHER CASE each individual would watch a two hour movie in two hours of THEIR OWN TIME. The real question is, "Is there more time between the ticks of the clock as you approach the speed of light or not." I don't have that answer. And nothing YOU or I can do will prove it one way or another. I wish we could.
I hope this makes sense. Not trying to be an ass.

Dave

go spin around up your butt or something

[citfta]

Another fine example of our educational system at work.

i dont care what none of you *******s say. your stupid not me. so there. i dont give a crap. ill agree withanything that goes against yo8u. and screw this disinfo agent turion. in teh topic too. Your stupid.

[altrez]

Another fine example of our educational system at work.

It is pretty sad when you think about it.



-Altrez

[Ufopolitics]

Originally Posted by johnnyfalcon View Post
if two people are watching the same movie/broadcast and one is in a rocket they still watch at the same rate


SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME HOW I AM WRONG
relativity says this is wrong what a load of @*@*@

if i am wrong tell me how, why i am wrong

DO NOT TRY TO DERAIL THIS QUESTION THIS QUESTION IS STRAIGHTFORWARD

the only way we can get the truth is to stay focused on what im talking about

Im waiting on a counter argument

If youre a reletivist and dodge the question you lose the argument