Don't attempt this radiant energy experiment.

[pomodoro]

No probs, I'll be doing more badge tests soon, now that I know that I won't be triggering false alarms I will be exposing the badges for longer periods.

[Berg]

The Basis of this Technology

For the sake of your own health that of others around you, please do not attempt to replicate the experiment where Eric Dollard collects radiant energy from a light bulb powered by a Tesla coil.
Its an impressive experiment, but very dangerous.

Please see this short video to find out why.

https://youtu.be/5gcwvPcEi2k

I believe this technology is similar to the technology that the Russians are employing in their electronic weapons, which they used with great ease in disabling the USS Donald Cook. See story: Russian Fighter Jet Disables US Missle Destroyer Using Electronic Warfare Weapon - YouTube

See: Khibiny

By the way, I remember a report that a captured military Russian jet had vacuum tubes instead of solid-state components. I thought, "How primitive." However, there is a reason for this. From what I have read, they are able to survive an EMP.

The use of vacuum tubes also makes the aircraft's systems resistant to an electromagnetic pulsehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan-Gurevich_MiG-25

Reference: http://www.energeticforum.com/genera...20422-emp.html

Reference: Former Federal Employee Reveals Shocking Info-Russia, EMPs & Martial Law

[Sputins]

The monitor resuts are back!

And I have to eat my words.

The badge received zero uSv of photon energy.

I'm still confused, but it looks like no Xrays are produced.

I'll have another look at this one day, but hopefully someone else can do some further investigations with faraday cages and the like.

[pomodoro]

Hi Sputins, all I've proven is that the minimum 1uSv was not detected in 45 seconds. Having recently used another counter I borrowed, there are 2.5mr/hr at three feet away and since these badges only seem to register a minimum of 1uSv it makes sense that nothing showed up.
My setup is not like a standard xray tube either, the 'missing' terminal is not grounded to earth in the device, which makes the HV terminal neutral too.

May I suggest that you run a similar experiment, making sure that there is a strong attraction to the tube by the foil and expose a badge for a much longer period, or keep it next to the tube. I have to wait a few months for the next pickup.

As far as suing Eric, well someone would have to have money and time to waste, as not much will come out of it, as few uSv of Xrays probably don't do much. Tesla lived a long time and he exposed himself to his unipolar Xray tube for many hours, mastering the art of x-ray pictures, suffering burns and headaches but still did not get cancer. Perhaps someone should get some notes on that device of his.
Make no mistakes, in a court room, some Xrays will be detected, nobody knows anything about the 'other' rays.

So for now, I'm saying there is no massive amount of Xrays from my setup. I have no idea about Eric's setup, but the heated filament still worries me, and when I do the next badge test, I will also report on that. If in the mean time someone can do some similar tests properly, it would be of great benefit.
Cheers for Now

[pomodoro]

Ernst, have you had time to play with the bits you ordered?
I'll be able to do another badge exposure soon.

[Ernst]

Not much, but I tried a few things.
My GMC responds to HF radiation near the Tesla coil (small SEC). There seems to be no difference with or without the lightbulb attached.
One of the bulbs now has its filament broken because a discharge to the outside of the bulb.

As I said, not much time yet.


Ernst.