Gerard Morin Energy

[Hitby13kw]

McCulloch generator now runs on gasoline, propane, or natural gas

Did a quick test today, added a fuel regulator to the genset from US Carburetion Inc. or Tri-Fuel KitsMcCulloch generator can now run on gasoline, propane, or natural gas - YouTube

Hitby13kw

[BroMikey]

Did a quick test today, added a fuel regulator to the genset from US Carburetion Inc. or Tri-Fuel KitsMcCulloch generator can now run on gasoline, propane, or natural gas - YouTube

Hitby13kw

Hey Hitby

That Generator looks so nice and you are taking good care of what me and the guys sent you. That shows that you are going to incorporate that genset somewhere even if the OU does not manifest. What a great modification so you don't have to smell those rotten gasoline fumes. Way to go.

I have one that runs of all 3 gases but doing away with gasoline was the best thing I ever did to mine. Lean burn will change your mind about running gensets being to expensive.

You got out the chopsaw so I can hear it cut Thanks I needed that. This is very important to our replicator buddies so we can all hear the way the chopsaw sounds and of course if to much pressure is applied those big 14" blades slow and bog down the motor and so on.

This gives us all a feel for what you are seeing when you make a video and share. That way when you put 500-1000-1500-2000-3000watts on the back end and the genset is not laboring we should be able to tell some difference.

I really don't know. It stumbled pretty good there when you bare down but maybe that was because it had not warmed up all of the way. Getting to know what our genset can do is important. I wonder how it sounds when you throw all the heater and the chopsaw at it?

Either way this is a beginning. It is a 3300watt but I would bet at about 2500 watts it would start groaning. Also let me do some repeating. The amps could be measure as our friend here has suggested, NO? The question is "DO you have a good amp clamp?" This should eliminate any possible discrepancies with shunts that MIGHT throw off results.

Also I think each time you run the energy through a transformer you will lose 5 percent so figure 10 percent using two of them. So for every 1000 watts you pull out of the McCulloch you will have 900 watts available.

A 10 percent reduction is nothing when you consider the claim of approx 2 :1 or a COP of 2X + twice as much out as going in. Many people have pointed out the reasoning behind running the voltages up to gain energy into a system. I am not referring to the flawed university models. Something about squaring the voltage of power I can't think right now.


Thanks for letting me see and hear the McCulloch run under load with a chopsaw. The question will be to see if the chop-saw performance is reduced at the other end due to adding the additional amp draws coming from heaters and the such like resistive draws.

Does the genset die if you run 3300watts? The amp clamp will tell us something. We really need to stay down an output of no more than 3000watts because we are only running a 25kw not a 50kw.

Just repeating more, bare with me. So this will be interesting to measure a load of say 3000watts with the McCulloch now groaning in pain. I am wondering if the readings will show us anything.

Gerard was acting like it was not a measurable effect and that the McCulloch could not provide that much output yet he was getting big power. Or was he is the question. Gerards breaker/fuse had not blown being rated at 30 amps @120vac. Let's say is was running at just under MaX of 25ampsX120vac = 3000wats input just as Gerard had thought.

Since we only want half that input it will be harder to tell just how much the genset can take or it is using. Just some thoughts running through my room, tonight. That chopsaw is a 1500 watt device I think and so you only need another blow dryer or a resistive heater element of some kind.

What I am trying to point out is that maybe the Genset might work it's best at 65 percent of it's running max and we are going to be at about 45 percent.

Oh well that 37.5 kw is bigger and we can do a test later on that one also. Is that 37.5 kw got a 480vdc input?

Thanks Hitby for all the hard work, have fun, stay safe and enjoy the weather.

Mikey

[wantomake]

Video

This is what I've been working on.
Thanks,
Wantomake

Forum tests - YouTube

[Hitby13kw]

This is what I've been working on.
[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkbTpLn6q68[/VIDEO]

[BroMikey]

At the time I posted about using the clamp on ammeter from Harbor Freight I had not seen the videos by Hitby. I had only read someone posting about the loses from using a shunt type ammeter. The videos I saw by Hiby show him using a current transformer type watt meter that not only shows us the current but also the voltage and calculates the wattage. His meters are WAY better than anything you can get from Harbor Freight. The coil around the wire (current transformer) will have virtually no effect on the power.

Carroll

I was wondering who was going to see that. So the amp meters are settled? I forgot that fact myself so you are correct. HITBY's amp-meter is an amp probe not directly tied into the line. What's wrong with me?

Okay I remember that now, he showed this early on. Like I said Hitby is way ahead of us. He's da man who knows what's gonna be needed.

Thanks for the wake up.

[StudentofEnergy]

Thermo-Reactive Liquid Crystal

Hi guys, I'm posting a video right now on this Polyester sheet covered in temp reactive material. I've seen Gerard focus on temp in his videos, he did when I visited him and recently another video from a replicator. The video is one with a guy wrapping a toy car with thermo reactive paint in a wire close to the spark gap. He gets a color change during his experiment and I wanted to see what a professional material would do with close to this setup. You will see in the video that the material reacts as soon as I start the heat transfer or reaction and will continue while the circuit is running. It will also stay reactive after for a long period of time, in relation to how long it should stay visible. Okay I think once the energy transfer / reaction starts the "cold radiation" Gerard talks about pulls in energy from the surrounding area to keep the reaction going. I'm not sure of course if this is the case but its my thought on the matter. Please chime in if you have any knowledge or ideas; very interesting!
Gerard Morin Thermochromic "Cold Radiation" Test - YouTube

p.s. be kind guys I'm in the middle of a move and only had a few minutes to set up for and shoot this little video :P

[BroMikey]

Yes I remember all of that. When we are done talking about the conventional setup tuning may be needed. Like Turion/Dave said that he can get the effect and then he can't get the effect then Dave says "Welcome to my world"

Are we reaching you? The amp burning contest no longer appeals to me anymore, Thus the search for NON-AMP BURNING devices.

What I would like to know is this.

With you obvious advanced learning what could be done to recirculate energy. My OU experiences are not related to this thread. We need to move over to the Osc thread.

Yes we are all aware that LED lighting is more efficient. Still if a bulb (OF LED LIGHTS) is rated at 5 watts you wouldn't expect it to operate at the same light giving capacity on 2 watts.

I have conventional transformers that run under the conventional amp burning topology yet give COP increases. Prove that to you

Good Day PS go prove it to yourself. Skeptic It's Okay

You are not looking for OU or you would not make such ridiculous statements. Better fasten yer seat belt. Course you never will believe it.

Just wanted to share these below details here as well. Maybe someone can make some use of it.

Cheers.
Gene

<snip>
You know whats sorta stupid about the multiverse idea?

It sits on the idea that there are different forms of space, when all we objectively have to go on is our current context we find ourselves in.

In this context we see that EM frequency causes different results depending on the total periodicity defined with a base of 1 pulse per second equaling 1 hertz. To more thoroughly denote what this 1 Hertz is requires the addition of defining the pulse to be of 50% duty cycle, so that it is actually On for Half the second and OFF for the other half, before its again On to define the single pulse per second in the next second.

So what is called 1 Hertz is comprised of 50% ON time and 50% OFF time sharing that arbitrary unit called the second.

Now we've defined the Hertz, we haven't accounted for if this is an AC term or a DC term, and in truth it doesn't really matter except that the waveform is one of smooth transitions (AC inversions) or of pulsed abrupt transitions (DC pulsations).

AC is a more Controlled function because it transitions thru its full sequence in ordered rates of change over time.

DC is a Less controlled function because it transitions To FULL ON from FULL OFF instantly, (the square wave form), and from Full On to Full Off instantly.

Both of the waveforms from the above two conditions of DC energy are noting the VOLT potential on the circuit. One would have to add Current probes in parallel to the Volt probes to garner the actual current functions in relation to these types of power.

If we apply these two now defined energy types to a solenoid, we might then see what happens in terms of Current.

AC fed thru an inductance is already changing at the sources set frequency, and the inductance that its going thru will either retard or advance potentially the waveform based on how the wound solenoids own internal frequency (the freq it would ring at if struck and let ring) matches up or skews.

DC fed thru a solenoid however passes the Volt potential instantly thru the wire, while here the concept of Time Constants is brought into play.

DC applied to an inductance will have its CURRENT come up in a Curve that is determined by the inductances Total time constant divided by 5 so that during each of the 5 time constants ~68% of the max current is realized to flow thru the inductance. As each time constant passes the Current that flows to catch up to the applied Volt potential on the solenoid, that current comes up by 68% of the total remaining current not yet realized on the solenoid.

Thus by example, if a solenoid has 1 amp max current realizable on it due the volt potential applied it, when that DC current flows, 68% of that 1amp will flow in the First Time Constant. The Second Time constant will see 68% of the remaining current then Also flow, and so on to the 5th time Constant at which point any additional increase in CURRENT flow fails to be realized. Thus if the first constant saw 680mA flow from the 1000mA total current that Can flow, the second constant will see 320mA*.68= 217.6mA of current Flow in addition to the first 680mA so that after the first two time constants having passed, 680+217.6=897.6mA flowing. The 3rd TC then only gets 68% of 102mA which is All thats left to flow after the first two TC's have completed. Another 69mA flows for TC 3. For TC 4, only 33mA is left that can flow... and so on to the 5th TC. (after which not enough additional current flows that might then need to be accounted for.)

One last little tidbit that took me years to finally look at... John Bedinis SG pulses his Target coil at about 1/3 of the First TC's total period for the actual inductance used in the circuit. Its then off before the second 2/3rds of the first TC can complete, nevermind the full 5 TC's. I tried to replicate that with all sorts of other switch triggered methods but none did it like the inductively coupled cowound windings local to the solenoid being pulsed.

Posting for any to pull as needful to further their own learnings.
<end snip>

Hi Mikey,

I don't make wild claims I can't back up, which is why you don't hear me make the claim that I can light up the whole room.

Would making wild claims make you support my efforts more? :P

I have transformers like Gerards, particularly the one he claims is outputting 400,000 volts... which is more like 4500volts, maybe double that since the drive freq out from the drain pump is about doubled at 7200rpm... so tops about 10kv ac output from that type of transformers 120v primary attached directly to the drain pump motor output.

I do not have pole pigs. Those are beyond my money means and besides I have nowhere left to store them anyways. To many 3 phase motors taking up space.


You need to understand that LED tech is not OU. LED tech is MORE EFFICIENT lighting tech than the old incandescents primarily because they have removed the HEATING component from the LED's, which is why a 20watt LED puts out 60Watts equivalent light. IS that OU? NO it is not. It is simply more efficient.

Show me one context where you personally have overunity Mikey!

You keep HOPING eternally even when the simple basics are overlooked in favor of hype and marketing. I'm not against you hoping, but after so long in attempting to do this type of work you also should be familiar with basics that make watts and have some simplified method to review WHATEVER system some inventor puts in front of you to grasp what they're doing.

Just the fact that they AVOID (like the plague) taking both Volts AND AMPS into account on the output from the mcculloch, they don't want to FACE reality. They can believe as long as they want, one day they will want to know and then they will do the needful. Till then, ain't no point getting caught up in that slurry.

The best I saw was bedinis hyper charging of capacitors with his SG.

By All means Mikey, YOU can buy either of them and prove it out for yourself. I have done the work needful to see whats present OBJECTIVELY.

You can't remember huh? And yet you're the leader of this circus? :P haha Ok man, feel free to take the tact of attacking the guy sharing DETAILS.

I can see my sharing has fallen on deaf ears, not that it matters, it wasn't required that you'd understand, simply that I'd be willing to share. And I was/did.

Good luck, I'll follow hitby and see if he proves it out to your satisfaction or if you got other bones to pick there too.

(by the way BELIEF has nothing to do with nothing. You can believe till ur blue in the face but that doesn't make whatever Objectively so. You guys would do well to deal with reality and start with DC basics, last time I'm gonna say as much.)

Hitby, You're good man, keep it up. You'll prove the guys claims out soon enough. At least you stick to the systems instead of random "claim" commentary!

Cheers!
Gene

[BroMikey]

Great test dude. Keep up the fight to "go beyond" the amp burning non recycled circuits Radiant is the good stuff showing up on your sheet.

Mikey

Hi guys, I'm posting a video right now on this Polyester sheet covered in temp reactive material. I've seen Gerard focus on temp in his videos, he did when I visited him and recently another video from a replicator. The video is one with a guy wrapping a toy car with thermo reactive paint in a wire close to the spark gap. He gets a color change during his experiment and I wanted to see what a professional material would do with close to this setup. You will see in the video that the material reacts as soon as I start the heat transfer or reaction and will continue while the circuit is running. It will also stay reactive after for a long period of time, in relation to how long it should stay visible. Okay I think once the energy transfer / reaction starts the "cold radiation" Gerard talks about pulls in energy from the surrounding area to keep the reaction going. I'm not sure of course if this is the case but its my thought on the matter. Please chime in if you have any knowledge or ideas; very interesting!
Gerard Morin Thermochromic "Cold Radiation" Test - YouTube

p.s. be kind guys I'm in the middle of a move and only had a few minutes to set up for and shoot this little video :P

[BroMikey]

Wow Wantomake

You are a very serious researcher. I didn't realize just how much. The basic setups will lead you to understand radiant power and to recirculate energy. Now it's all up to you. Looks like you have your thinkin cap on already.

Mikey

This is what I've been working on.
Thanks,
Wantomake

Forum tests - YouTube

[shylo]

Nice work

Want to make, Beautiful work
Wish I could build like that.
But you need to get away from known forms , accepted ways of doing things.
All three will give whats expected of them.
Have you ever built a mag track?
Thanks
artv

[Hitby13kw]

Hi guys, I'm posting a video right now on this Polyester sheet covered in temp reactive material. I've seen Gerard focus on temp in his videos, he did when I visited him and recently another video from a replicator. The video is one with a guy wrapping a toy car with thermo reactive paint in a wire close to the spark gap. He gets a color change during his experiment and I wanted to see what a professional material would do with close to this setup. You will see in the video that the material reacts as soon as I start the heat transfer or reaction and will continue while the circuit is running. It will also stay reactive after for a long period of time, in relation to how long it should stay visible. Okay I think once the energy transfer / reaction starts the "cold radiation" Gerard talks about pulls in energy from the surrounding area to keep the reaction going. I'm not sure of course if this is the case but its my thought on the matter. Please chime in if you have any knowledge or ideas; very interesting!

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDBsS_Fiaig[/VIDEO]

p.s. be kind guys I'm in the middle of a move and only had a few minutes to set up for and shoot this little video :P

[Turion]

WHAT IF what we are seeing with the "cooling effect"is nothing more than simple THERMOELECTRIC REFRIGERATION? We have seen batteries and the motor "ice up" during experiments with the 3BGS, and I have wondered if that is what takes place there.

For your information:
Thermoelectric Refrigeration is the process of pumping heat energy out of an insulated chamber in order to reduce the temperature of the chamber below that of the surrounding air. Thermoelectric refrigeration uses a principle called the "PELTIER" effect to pump heat electronically. The Peltier effect is named after a French scientist who discovered it in 1834..

HOW DOES IT WORK?

In 1834 Jean Peltier noted that when an electrical current is applied across the junction of two dissimilar metals, heat is removed from one of the metals and transferred to the other. This is the basis of thermoelectric refrigeration. Thermoelectric modules are constructed from a series of tiny metal cubes of dissimilar exotic metals which are physically bonded together and connected electrically. When electrical current passes through the cube junctions, heat is transferred from one metal to the other. Solid-state thermoelectric modules are capable of transferring large quantities of heat when connected to a heat absorbing device on one side and a heat dissipating device on the other. The Koolatron's internal aluminium cold plate fins absorb heat from the contents, (food and beverages), and the thermoelectric modules transfer it to heat dissipating fins under the control panel. Here, a small fan helps to disperse the heat into the air. The system is totally environmentally friendly and contains no hazardous gases, nor pipes nor coils and no compressor. The only moving part is the small 12-volt fan. Thermoelectric modules are too expensive for normal domestic and commercial applications which run only on regular household current. They are ideally suited to recreational applications because they are lightweight, compact, insensitive to motion or tilting, have no moving parts, and can operate directly from 12-volt batteries.

Dave

[wantomake]

Yes having fun

Thanks guys,
I look forward to the great finds that will come from this.

artv, never built a mag track. Been reading and studying very much since becoming a member here, but do remember seeing this on Youtube.

Sorry but I'm wired totally opposite of most people. Therefore I'll try every known and unknown experiment that this crazy brain of mine thinks up. I enjoy the testing and what unknowns comes from each setup. I broke free of the box many years ago. That's why I want to help here as I can, member's here got away from known forms, accepted ways of doing things.

Christopher, that's the coolest finding I've seen ! What if you cut the film to form a tube around the spark gap. Then wrap your hand around the film to start the process. Would the reaction spread around the form? I like your statement that energy is being pulled in not put out.

Do you ALL agree that Gerard Morin may have found a way to pull in the energy,
wantomake

Want to make, Beautiful work
Wish I could build like that.
But you need to get away from known forms , accepted ways of doing things.
All three will give whats expected of them.
Have you ever built a mag track?
Thanks
artv

[Turion]

McCulloch

Thanks to citfta, I was able to pick up a brand new rotor to a McCulloch generator off e-Bay tonight. It is still in the box. So now I have TWO of the McCulloch generators and a spare rotor. With that extra rotor I will be able to pull coils off one of the existing McCulloch generators (or use them as templates to make my own) and put together a generator that runs powered by a 12 volt or 120 volt motor. Electrical input vs electrical output will be way easier to determine with that kind of setup. It may take a little machine work to get the razor scooter motor to run it, but that shouldn't be a problem. Got some things working in that area also.

Dave

[BroMikey]

What you are asking me to explain is, years of various studies in a single sentence. Generally speaking what I mean is this. Let's take something that everyone knows about. Look at John Bedini coils that are twisted and the regular circuits with swinging magnets.

Nothing OU about twisted wire, nothing OU about a transistor with a bunch of resistors burning power, yet OU shows up in the Battery. The point is when you look for the magic with an open mind you are going to finally find it.

The conventional transformer burns amps with a known max efficiency of no more than 95 percent but if the energy that is running in it's vains is rerun back around again, you have OU. That does not mean you can loop it yet. It just means that it is over 100 percent efficient.

As a for instance a Mosfet is an OU device right out of the package. The patent office is loaded with Patents that have devices running OU in that the device is over a COP of 1.

In the past, transformers were approx 65 percent efficient but by today's standards our 95 percent efficiencies transformers would be OU to the people in the early 1900's.

OU is anything over and above normal amp burning topology. The sky is the limit. After material data is reanalyzed and replaced to produce a near 100 percent efficiency, the only thing left is to recirculate the power.

Lately it has become well known that "REACTIVE POWER" is a component of energy that can run everything without trashing the dipole "as they say".

The common denominator seems to lead me in the direction of reactive power strategies. Since no terminology exists for what I am talking about I am made out to be a spectacle, a freak of nature who should be driven into the woodlands where the mad men go

Or for lack of a more arrogant selection of words "A babbling idiot"

Oh well I know what I mean and that is all that is important. Comparing what we learn in alternative energy device studies with conventional text books is referred to as a paradox.

Erase everything you know and remember it slowly and reorder some of it, throw a bunch out. It's all up to you. Maybe now we can see why Tom Beardon said that we need young fresh minds armed with this new knowledge if we are ever going to put a dent in this present flawed system.

"Think different" as it has been suggested is easy to say and harder to do.

I am glad you asked

Mikey

Can you tell us a little more about these transformers you have? Are you saying they have a COP greater than one? If so, can you show us a picture or at least explain why you think they have a COP greater than one?




Respectfully,
Carroll