'Free energy' thats been hiding under your noses from Faraday and Maxwell themselves

[Ted Ewert]

You have a lot of folks on this forum who passively read along with whatever is posted. They are also builders who would take the time and spend the money to incorporate new design principals into the construction of new devices. If you would spend some time here to outline how these principles can be applied to the actual build of a device, you might be surprised by how many folks would be willing to contribute and post what they have done so that we can move toward a solution for all.

I myself have some ideas based on what you have shown so far, and am in the planning stages of a build. My problem is time. I have entirely too many projects "under construction" and until I have a clear "winner" it is hard to focus all my attention on just one build or one concept. So it is with others also.

Dave

Hi Dave,
I'm with you there about spelling out the practical side of theory. I'm going to be doing some experiments over the next few weeks and will gladly share my results.
I'm still mentally digesting some new insights which have to be converted into reality, but based on what I have experienced so far I think some results are possible.

Cheers,

Ted

[Turion]

And once you HAVE spent all the money and have a patent in place, then the fun begins. You get to defend your patent IN COURT against every patent challenge by a major corporation that does not WANT your product on the market. Why do you think they spend hundreds of thousands of dollars buying up worthless patents and putting them on the shelves? It is so they have the foundation for patent challenges to anything actually useful that comes along. Do YOU have the money to defend challenge after challenge to any little part of your design that might be similar to someone else's? Unlikely. But THEY have the money to put you out of business. You MIGHT be one of the lucky ones that gets bought off. More likely you will be one driven into bankruptcy with law suits.

My wife works in intellectual property law, so I know a little about all of this and she and I have HAD conversations about whether to apply for patents or not.

Dave

[Ted Ewert]

Question to Theo: In your opinion, does the dielectric have a polarity, and if so, how is it polarized?

[TheoriaApophasis]

In your opinion, does the dielectric have a polarity, and if so, how is it polarized?

Dielectricity is definitionally the OPPOSITE of polarization.

its radial, centripetal, inertial, and counterspatial.


This is also the 100% premise of Maxwell, E. Dollard, Steinmetz, Dr. Oleg D., and Tesla.

[tachyon]

non-uniform(divergent) fields create polarization in dielectrics thus a net force, dielectrics are the ones who get polarized.

[TheoriaApophasis]

non-uniform(divergent) fields create polarization in dielectrics thus a net force, dielectrics are the ones who get polarized.

divergent = polarization
convergent = inertial, counterspatial / radial dielectricity (or gravity)

dielectricity is by definition not polarized, you're talking about TEM or AC electricity.

dielectrics in a binding system can be displaced into a radial disk, in the "shape" of an accretion plane.

the smaller the space = the MORE dielectric capacitance.

just the inverse to magnetism = more field = more space (polarized by definition).

Nope, dielectrics get TORQUED, not polarized. Big difference.

Fields dont seek polarization, ...imbalances in equilibrium due to moving fields, charges, or a prime mover moving a polarized field to created polarized electricity does.

Dielectrics ARE THAT which create resultantly polarization.

in creating a 'magnet', its electrified, increasing dielectric capacitance in the inter-atomic, and resultantly causing macro-magnetic preponderances.

A leads to B leads to C.

A increases B , which causes polarization (rather macro-magnetism) increase in C (magnetism).



Magnetism cannot, never has and never will exist ALONE, by itself. Dielectricity is a whole other matter.

Noone in the universe has EVER seen "just magnetism"

its attributional in the inter-atomic, or as found in TEM, or as a field attribution TO a dielectrically capacitant object.
or as magneto-dilectricity in the inter-atomic.

[wrtner]

The problem is that when the coils fire, nothing happens quickly.

There may be something wrong here, but don't forget that this should not be assumed to be a problem. A very slow running device can be subject to gearing if the power is sufficient to warrant it. Some Victorian stationary steam engines ran very slowly.

[tachyon]

there can be polarization in dielectrics from magnetism alone since it's a divergent field and depends on 1/r^3 (as well as from magnetism,gravity you name it), polarization depends on electron and bond configuration certain isomeres might be natural dielectrics if the polarization torque doesnt cancel between electronegative or electropositive atoms, what im talking about is induced polarization which is the same as polarization the force is towards the source of the field and doesnt depend on the polarity of the field so dielectricity is polarization. so in you answer everything IS a dielectric the only things not dielectrics are the atoms themselves although this has never been tested! and is a reason why I made a similar hypothesis since this way energy is conserved and some other phenomena are explained.

[Ted Ewert]

There may be something wrong here, but don't forget that this should not be assumed to be a problem. A very slow running device can be subject to gearing if the power is sufficient to warrant it. Some Victorian stationary steam engines ran very slowly.

I agree, it can be engineered. A large, heavy flywheel and proper geometry would be required, but it's definitely doable. As I mentioned earlier though, magnets do not act like you think they should in this type of switching arrangement. I have tried several different configurations with widely varying results. It can be quite confusing and frustrating at times.
I have developed a new type of switch recently which I have yet to try in a motor configuration. Spare time is my biggest hurdle, but if there is any interest here I could set up a quick test.

[Ted Ewert]

Dielectricity is definitionally the OPPOSITE of polarization.

its radial, centripetal, inertial, and counterspatial.


This is also the 100% premise of Maxwell, E. Dollard, Steinmetz, Dr. Oleg D., and Tesla.

So, any "polarization" would be geometric rather than plus and minus.
However, if there is a "flow" into or out of the magnet, the direction could also be considered polarized.

[tachyon]

any type of machine that has charge transfer through high voltage : super losses in em and ir

[tachyon]

theoriapofasis what is your opinion on maxwells displacement current?

[TheoriaApophasis]

polarization depends on electron and bond configuration .

What unicorns? W. Russell

- C.P. Steinmetz (Electric Discharges, Waves and Impulses)

so in you answer everything IS a dielectric

I said no such thing.

Everything is a FILED modality.

[TheoriaApophasis]

So, any "polarization" would be geometric rather than plus and minus.
However, if there is a "flow" into or out of the magnet, the direction could also be considered polarized.

geometric-polarized-spatial all are conceptually the same term in the 4 energy archetypes
(which by the way even Plato and Aristotle mention the 4 archetypes of energy!)



additive in + time (spatially , rather specifically the space IT is creating, but not 'into space') = TEM , magnetism , mass (but NOT its field, gravity)

but raised to the NEGATIVE (-time [meaning NO time, not reverse time]) grav, dielectricity = counterspace


vs. multiplicative in - space (counterspatial) such as dielectricity and gravity (dielectricity terminates into matter creation in 'galactic level' generators).....,.....same way electricity terminates and dumps into magnetism.

but raised to the POSITIVE = +space = polarized = magnetism, TEM




Of course what 'props up' matter is its nucleal spin which generates magnetism which 'fills the volume' of the inter-atomic.
a perfect (usually) equilibrium between what (matter) is spatially additive but its field is overwhelmingly -space, is dielectric, is gravity.


E. Dollard goes into this in great detail, see here:[/COLOR][/B]

Start at 1:12.00 here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQuNvqbH6ac

[dmann]

3D Printed Wireless Motor - Mini AtmoMotor - YouTube

lasersaber has done some work with Jefiminko's static motor designs.
They are interesting. He has the stl files up on his site for this small motor if anyone here wants to replicate it on a 3d printer. He has run a larger one with atmospheric electricity.